We expect the new Biden administration to reverse on a massive scale Trump’s deregulation of energy and to turn strongly to sustainable-energy policy. The implications for investing in ESG are huge. Cumberland holds positions in wind, solar and water and we expect to hold those positions for a long cycle of growth. Markets are already moving to reprice this dramatic shift in policy. Anyone wishing to discuss the ESG approach at Cumberland in stocks or in bonds can email me, and I will pass the message on to the right person for discussion. Cumberland has a new as of this year, Pandemic-Affected Municipal Bond Strategy (PAMS). If you have an interest, contact us for more information about this strategy.
Here’s what’s happening in the Biden transition team on the climate agenda, from Wednesday’s edition of POLITICO Playbook:
“TRANSITION DEETS … WAPO’S MATT VISER: At the Environmental Protection Agency, acting deputy chief of staff Wes Carpenter met with the transition team’s point person, Patrice Simms. When it comes to the environment, the transition from Trump to Biden is likely to involve a dizzying effort to halt the deregulatory zeal of the past four years and to reestablish the United States as a global force for tackling climate change.
“At the Department of Justice – where some officials were privately frustrated at being unable to work with Biden’s team sooner – Lee Lofthus, the assistant attorney general for administration, was tapped to work with Biden’s agency team, led by Christopher H. Schroeder, a former Justice Department official now at Duke Law School, according to a Justice Department official.
“At the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the agency’s transition team was scheduled to hold an initial call with the Biden administration’s review committee Tuesday afternoon. NOAA leadership has prepared ‘extensive’ briefing materials on agency operations, a senior NOAA official said. Officials at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, who had previously ordered civil servants not to talk to Biden’s transition team, were scheduling meetings Tuesday and putting together a briefing book.”
(“POLITICO Playbook: Some good news ahead of Thanksgiving,” https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2020/11/25/some-good-news-ahead-of-thanksgiving-490992)
Here’s a detailed reference in the wealth management area with regard to these changes. There is a lot to absorb here, and it is well worth the time to read it.
“Will Biden Take Action on ESG Regulation?” https://www.wealthmanagement.com/regulation-compliance/will-biden-take-action-esg-regulation
Let me move to the outgoing Trump administration’s trying to make a final policy stand. We believe that any actions taken by Trump’s anti-climate colleagues will be attacked and reversed immediately when the Biden administration takes office. That means the prices that are sought by Trump’s friends and colleagues are negatively impacted right now. We expect any leasing rights they may sell will be marked down by bidders. Think about it. Would you buy something when you are headed into a massive headwind against the business model you are trying to achieve?
Let’s move north of the Arctic Circle.
As a departing action, the Trump administration is moving quickly to open up an additional 1.6 million acres of Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to oil and gas development. Doing so when there is a huge supply overhang in oil and natural gas is a questionable move. The effort to sell the drilling rights before Biden takes office is well underway, but there is pushback in the form of lawsuits filed by Native Alaskan tribes and a coalition of 15 US states.
At stake are an estimated 7.7 billion barrels of oil under the ANWR coastal plain, versus what Margorie Gemmill, First Chief of the Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, calls “one of the most important natural, cultural, and subsistence resources to the Neets’ąįį Gwich’in of Arctic Village and Venetie and to the Gwich’in people as a whole.” She affirms, “As tribal governments, we will defend the rights of our people at all costs.”
According to Fox News,
“Despite the region being opened for drilling, it is unclear if there is a willingness on the part of companies to wade into the area amid questions about the future demand for oil and vows from large banks not to invest in the region. Several major banks, including Wells Fargo & Co. and Morgan Stanley, have announced in recent months they will pull back from supporting oil and gas projects in the refuge.”
(“Two lawsuits filed against Trump’s plan to open oil and gas drilling in Alaska’s Arctic refuge,”https://www.foxnews.com/politics/two-lawsuits-trump-oil-gas-drilling-alaskas-arctic-refuge)
Following up on the situation in the Arctic, we turn to meteorologist Jim Roemer, who has a new newsletter called Climatelligence.Here’s a link to get a sample: https://www.bestweatherinc.com/free-winter-report/. Jim focuses on commodity trading and weather-related drivers. He also provided two links from Climatelligence for us to share with readers.
The first one is a news report from Euronews on the failure of Arctic sea ice to form this October: “Arctic sea ice isn’t freezing in October for the first time on record,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1gXS9QYlQA&feature=youtu.be. You wouldn’t normally encounter this report in the US.
The second link is to a NASA report on what satellites have revealed about warming in the Arctic: “NASA Sees High Temperatures, Wildfires, Sea Ice Minimum Extent in Warming Arctic,” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtM9KTVGFVw.
At the intersection of climate change and the financial sector, here’s the Fed’s new 80-page study on financial stability: https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/financial-stability-report-20201109.pdf. I recommend that every serious investor read it. Let me get to an excerpt on climate change. That section starts on page 58:
“Staff members throughout the Federal Reserve System continue to research the relationships among climate risks and economic and financial risks and, ultimately, to better identify the transmission channels through which climate risks could affect the financial sector. This work is conducted in close consultation with other U.S. agencies and international groups in an effort to strengthen the knowledge and understanding of this growing economic and financial stability issue.
“The Federal Reserve is evaluating and investing in ways to deepen its understanding of the full scope of implications of climate change for markets, financial exposures, and interconnections between markets and financial institutions. It will monitor and assess the financial system for vulnerabilities related to climate change through its financial stability framework. Moreover, Federal Reserve supervisors expect banks to have systems in place that appropriately identify, measure, control, and monitor all of their material risks, which for many banks are likely to extend to climate risks.”
In addition, the Chicago Fed has just published “A New Framework for Assessing Climate Change Risk in Financial Markets,” available at https://www.chicagofed.org/publications/chicago-fed-letter/2020/448.
The Brookings Institution community has weighed in with possible priorities the Biden administration might undertake: “Around the halls: What should the Biden administration prioritize in its climate policy?” https://www.brookings.edu/blog/planetpolicy/2020/11/23/around-the-halls-what-should-the-biden-administration-prioritize-in-its-climate-policy/.
And the WSJ takes a look at why investors are turning to wind and solar as costs have become competitive and investments offer returns comparable to those offered by utilities: “Why Investors Have Learned to Love Wind and Solar Power,” https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-investors-have-learned-to-love-wind-and-solar-power-11594027941
We also want to link again to the Climate Adaptation Center (CAC). Last week we published CEO Bob Bunting’s guest commentary on hurricane intensification and the CAC’s effort to implement adaptive strategies to counter growing climate-change impacts. The CAC’s immediate work focuses on Florida-specific issues, including hurricanes, red tide, and rising sea levels; but CAC is very sensitive to the arctic. A CAC board member, Bob Corell, has presented on Arctic melting here in Sarasota (https://youtu.be/BfHaMBXr718). In Florida, climate change is a big issue and a $7 trillion coastline facing a rising sea level is on everyone’s mind. CAC is a free sign-up, here: https://www.theclimateadaptationcenter.org/about-us/contact-us/.
While we are celebrating Thanksgiving and trying to be socially distant and wearing masks and caring about the health and safety of our families and friends and neighbors, perhaps this is a good, quiet time to contemplate global climate-change issues and what we can do about them.
At Cumberland we continue to overweight the solar, wind, and water sectors in our US ETF investment portfolios. We believe that events are already on a course that will eventually force more and more changes in behavior as the climate changes shock not only our private- and public-sector institutions but each of us personally.
The policy issues are in the hands of the next US administration and Congress. Climate adaptation is underway around the world, although the pace is slow and the climate doesn’t wait for governments to catch up. Right now, it is COVID that is at the top of everyone’s agenda, but while we wait for vaccine approval and distribution, the climate keeps changing; the globe keeps warming; sea levels keep rising.
We will end with an offering from economist friend Derek Riley, a long-time friend. During a combined European/American economists’ meeting in China, I recall standing with Derek in Shanghai and looking across the river at the spectacular space-age Shanghai cityscape. He described how what we were looking at was originally an oil refinery site. Derek had a long history with Elf Aquitaine. We talked about what it would mean if China committed to a climate change agenda, if the Chinese tired of unbreathable air in Beijing, if the poisoning of the country’s water were to stop, and whether a clean-up would reverse the damage. Derek said, “Here in China they can do whatever they decide to do. Notice that you don’t see a refinery complex here anymore.” For Derek’s bio, see this public link: https://conference-board.org/bio/index.cfm?bioid=469.
Here’s the amusing anecdote that Derek sent about this “green thing” and the generation gap. Happy Sunday.
“How the Grey-beards Have Destroyed the Planet”
Checking out at the supermarket, the young cashier suggested to the much older woman that she should bring her own grocery bags because plastic bags weren’t good for the environment.
The woman apologized and explained, “We didn’t have this ‘green thing’ back in my earlier days.”
The young cashier responded, “That’s our problem today – your generation did not care enough to save our environment for future generations.”
She was right, our generation didn’t have the ‘green thing’ in its day.
Back then, we returned milk bottles, lemonade bottles, and beer bottles to the shop. The shop sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilised and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over, so they really were recycled.
But we didn’t have the ‘green thing’ back in our day.
Grocery shops bagged our groceries in brown paper bags, that we re-used for numerous things, most memorable besides household bags for rubbish, was the use of brown paper bags as book covers for our schoolbooks. This was to ensure that public property (the books provided for our use by the school), was not defaced by our scribbling. Then we were able to personalize our books on the brown paper bags.
But too bad we didn’t do the ‘green thing’ back then.
We walked up stairs because we didn’t have a lift in every supermarket, shop and office building. We walked to the local shop and didn’t climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go half a mile.
But she was right. We didn’t have the ‘green thing’ in our day.
Back then, we washed the baby’s Terry Towelling nappies because we didn’t have the throwaway kind. We dried clothes on a line, not in an energy-gobbling machine burning up 3 kilowatts. Wind and solar power really did dry our clothes back in our early days. Kids had hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing.
But that young lady is right: We didn’t have the ‘green thing’ back in our day.
Back then, we had one radio or TV in the house – not a TV in every room, and the TV had a small screen the size of a big handkerchief (remember them?), not a screen the size of Tasmania, in the kitchen. We blended and stirred by hand because we didn’t have electric machines to do everything for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we used wadded-up old newspapers to cushion it, not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap. Back then, we didn’t fire up an engine and burn petrol just to cut the lawn. We pushed the mower that ran on human power. We exercised by working so we didn’t need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity.
But she’s right; we didn’t have the ‘green thing’ back then.
We drank from a tap or fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull.
But we didn’t have the ‘green thing’ back then.
Back then, people took the bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their Mums into a 24-hour taxi service in the family’s £50,000 People Carrier which cost 25% of the price of a whole house did before the ‘green thing.’ We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances, and we didn’t need a computerized gadget to receive a signal beamed from satellites 23,000 kms out in space to find the nearest pub!
But isn’t it sad that the current generation laments how wasteful we old folks were just because we didn’t have the ‘green thing’ back then?
Links to other websites or electronic media controlled or offered by Third-Parties (non-affiliates of Cumberland Advisors) are provided only as a reference and courtesy to our users. Cumberland Advisors has no control over such websites, does not recommend or endorse any opinions, ideas, products, information, or content of such sites, and makes no warranties as to the accuracy, completeness, reliability or suitability of their content. Cumberland Advisors hereby disclaims liability for any information, materials, products or services posted or offered at any of the Third-Party websites. The Third-Party may have a privacy and/or security policy different from that of Cumberland Advisors. Therefore, please refer to the specific privacy and security policies of the Third-Party when accessing their websites.
Cumberland Advisors Market Commentaries offer insights and analysis on upcoming, important economic issues that potentially impact global financial markets. Our team shares their thinking on global economic developments, market news and other factors that often influence investment opportunities and strategies.